*Radiant Energy” “Fire from Ice” or “Zero Point Energy”
About a Thomas H. Morey device
“The whole device was the size of a small suitcase, weighed about 20 kilograms, and for tens of hours it continuously powered consumers (mostly light bulbs) with a total power of 50,000 W! What is unusual is that when the iron was also connected (additional 1000 W), the bulbs did not show the slightest change in brightness; in doing so, the light they emitted was pure white, "at the blue end" of the spectrum, and not as usual - at the yellow. Large dark rings, described as a "circle of black fog" or "own shadow" of a light bulb whose entire "interior" looked "white incandescent", can be seen in photographs of light bulbs powered by radiant energy.
It is very interesting that classical voltmeters or ammeters could not measure the existence of radiant energy. What is even more unusual, all the large consumers (a few kilowatts) were powered by conductors of DISPROPECTLY small diameters, and, moreover, they were quite cold! With that (cold?) Energy, the engines could be started, but they were wound a little differently than the classic ones, where they had over 36,000 revolutions per minute, they did NOT heat up during operation, and a purple aura could be seen around them in the dark …
Ah, well the rings have the same look and behavior of smoke rings but aren't smoke at all, they look nearly exactly the same because it's a shadowing effect caused by vortex ring that exists in the hyperspatial manifold of time.
I'm going to scribble about this in a few days. I've been planning on but again appreciate that information. I don't think I recall reading that before so again I am pleased to see it.
I have highest respect for people who read what Roy writes & know how to build test models. Chapeau!
I don’t even grasp the abstract .. lol .. from the introduction it seems time is fluid and influenced by factors like geometry, matter an gauge sectors, whatever that is ..
… as well as Levi-Civita connection, Ricci scalar, Diffeomorphism invariance, Bianchi identity, warped ansatz, Hamiltonian density, Newtonian potential, Crank-Nicolson scheme, Dirichlet, Gibbons-Hawking-York term & the formulas look much like Sanskrit to me ;-)
But it’s very likely truly Sacred Geometry to which the flow field couples
I should start looking into Roy's Chronoflux, but had some other interesting pdf's open.. maybe I post some interesting bits of info from the one about Sacred Geometry of the Body, maybe it contains some more "inspiraton" of how it all works ... ?
"hyperspatial manifold of time" oh I love these abstract expressions ;-)
TIME .. if Space is potential energy in a system, then TIME is the kinetic energy in that system.
What causes Time? for us it's the sun .. or maybe I miss somehting?
It's the kinetic movement of the sun (for me) .. for others the rotation of earth
anyway there is solar wind, ether wind .. it's mouvement, kinetic energy, we just have to figure out "how to connect our machines to that wheel" or how to redistribute that energy and there comes the RESONANCE of frequencies
oh, btw, I thought that the shadowing could be the absence of LIGHT, as the light was used for energy ... I did play with contrast brightness of the foto, posted them
Thank you, that means a lot coming from someone like yourself, but of course I'm just the messenger boy, not the prophet, that all belongs to Roy D. Herbert.
All I'm doing is attempting to do is spread awareness. Herbert, well he should have received the Nobel Prize for this theory 30 years ago is what I've been told, and I can understand why now that I have some small grasp on that theory.
The longer Herbert's true understanding of physics is denied in academia, then the greater and more disruptive the consequences will be, and their own loss of credibility will probably destroy that part of the educational business model, sort of hope so, and maybe it has to be this way; who am I to question the Universe?
Suffice to say this; a voyage to the planet Mars shouldn't take any longer than a short commute to work does right now, maybe not even nearly that long, maybe instantaneously. I'm not to the point of understanding just how fast this theory could enable human beings to travel, but it is without doubt much greater than the so called speed of light.
I believe in previous posts I have left links to Roy's X account. He also has published a book recently; "Chronoflux Principia: The Hydrodynamics of Cosmic Time " This is an academically aimed technically competent text complete with mathematical equations.
The fact that almost the only people paying attention to his work are like minded theoretical physicists and mathematicians isn't accidental. He's got hot active resistance from organizations that really just do not want anyone understanding this theory, let alone how to go about implementing it. Think here outfits like "To The Stars Academy," and probably every quantum physicist and that might be because Roy's theory isn't really about Entropic Gravity, it's about Entropic Time, and Oh Boy is that a problem for the powers that be.
The fact that you yourself even considered something similar speaks volumes about the sort of technical knowledge you must hold in order for curiousity and creativity to imagine such an idea.
Rings of smoke emitted by devices powered by radiant energy
Since I saw the pic in your post, I tried to remember where I read about it
Excerpt from here: http://users.beotel.net/~gmarjanovic/En_VatraIzLeda.pdf
*Radiant Energy” “Fire from Ice” or “Zero Point Energy”
About a Thomas H. Morey device
“The whole device was the size of a small suitcase, weighed about 20 kilograms, and for tens of hours it continuously powered consumers (mostly light bulbs) with a total power of 50,000 W! What is unusual is that when the iron was also connected (additional 1000 W), the bulbs did not show the slightest change in brightness; in doing so, the light they emitted was pure white, "at the blue end" of the spectrum, and not as usual - at the yellow. Large dark rings, described as a "circle of black fog" or "own shadow" of a light bulb whose entire "interior" looked "white incandescent", can be seen in photographs of light bulbs powered by radiant energy.
It is very interesting that classical voltmeters or ammeters could not measure the existence of radiant energy. What is even more unusual, all the large consumers (a few kilowatts) were powered by conductors of DISPROPECTLY small diameters, and, moreover, they were quite cold! With that (cold?) Energy, the engines could be started, but they were wound a little differently than the classic ones, where they had over 36,000 revolutions per minute, they did NOT heat up during operation, and a purple aura could be seen around them in the dark …
Ah, well the rings have the same look and behavior of smoke rings but aren't smoke at all, they look nearly exactly the same because it's a shadowing effect caused by vortex ring that exists in the hyperspatial manifold of time.
I'm going to scribble about this in a few days. I've been planning on but again appreciate that information. I don't think I recall reading that before so again I am pleased to see it.
https://de.scribd.com/document/963025496/Chronoflux-Framework-Complete-Mathematic
I have highest respect for people who read what Roy writes & know how to build test models. Chapeau!
I don’t even grasp the abstract .. lol .. from the introduction it seems time is fluid and influenced by factors like geometry, matter an gauge sectors, whatever that is ..
… as well as Levi-Civita connection, Ricci scalar, Diffeomorphism invariance, Bianchi identity, warped ansatz, Hamiltonian density, Newtonian potential, Crank-Nicolson scheme, Dirichlet, Gibbons-Hawking-York term & the formulas look much like Sanskrit to me ;-)
But it’s very likely truly Sacred Geometry to which the flow field couples
I should start looking into Roy's Chronoflux, but had some other interesting pdf's open.. maybe I post some interesting bits of info from the one about Sacred Geometry of the Body, maybe it contains some more "inspiraton" of how it all works ... ?
"hyperspatial manifold of time" oh I love these abstract expressions ;-)
TIME .. if Space is potential energy in a system, then TIME is the kinetic energy in that system.
What causes Time? for us it's the sun .. or maybe I miss somehting?
It's the kinetic movement of the sun (for me) .. for others the rotation of earth
anyway there is solar wind, ether wind .. it's mouvement, kinetic energy, we just have to figure out "how to connect our machines to that wheel" or how to redistribute that energy and there comes the RESONANCE of frequencies
oh, btw, I thought that the shadowing could be the absence of LIGHT, as the light was used for energy ... I did play with contrast brightness of the foto, posted them
Thank you, that means a lot coming from someone like yourself, but of course I'm just the messenger boy, not the prophet, that all belongs to Roy D. Herbert.
All I'm doing is attempting to do is spread awareness. Herbert, well he should have received the Nobel Prize for this theory 30 years ago is what I've been told, and I can understand why now that I have some small grasp on that theory.
The longer Herbert's true understanding of physics is denied in academia, then the greater and more disruptive the consequences will be, and their own loss of credibility will probably destroy that part of the educational business model, sort of hope so, and maybe it has to be this way; who am I to question the Universe?
Suffice to say this; a voyage to the planet Mars shouldn't take any longer than a short commute to work does right now, maybe not even nearly that long, maybe instantaneously. I'm not to the point of understanding just how fast this theory could enable human beings to travel, but it is without doubt much greater than the so called speed of light.
I believe in previous posts I have left links to Roy's X account. He also has published a book recently; "Chronoflux Principia: The Hydrodynamics of Cosmic Time " This is an academically aimed technically competent text complete with mathematical equations.
The fact that almost the only people paying attention to his work are like minded theoretical physicists and mathematicians isn't accidental. He's got hot active resistance from organizations that really just do not want anyone understanding this theory, let alone how to go about implementing it. Think here outfits like "To The Stars Academy," and probably every quantum physicist and that might be because Roy's theory isn't really about Entropic Gravity, it's about Entropic Time, and Oh Boy is that a problem for the powers that be.
The fact that you yourself even considered something similar speaks volumes about the sort of technical knowledge you must hold in order for curiousity and creativity to imagine such an idea.
Thank you for the gracious comment.